3 ms·
I don't understand why these specifications: * Does not log anything about visitors. (A+1) * Follows the criteria in The Electronic Frontier Foundation’s best
by hackuser 11y ago
I don't understand why these specifications:
* Does not log anything about visitors. (A+1)
* Follows the criteria in The Electronic Frontier Foundation’s best practices for online service providers. (A+2)
* Follows the Web “Content” Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0) standard. (A+3)
* Follows the Web Accessibility Initiative — Accessible Rich Internet Applications 1.0 (WAI-ARIA 1.0) standard. (A+4)
.
... are considered less essential than these:
* Says “free software,” not “open source.” (A6)
* Clearly endorses the Free Software Movement's ideas of freedom. (A7)
* Avoids saying “Linux” without “GNU” when referring to GNU/Linux. (A8)
.
Is privacy and accessibility really less important than GNU's branding?
- dragonwriter 11y ago> Is privacy and accessibility really less important than GNU's branding? For the GNU project? Obviously. Heck, note that at an even higher level of importance than any of those, to be merely acceptable, a site must be one that "[r]ecommends and encourages GPL 3-or-later licensing at least as much as any other kind of licensing."