There's nothing wrong with the linked Bloomberg article, but it's a little barebones and link-free. Here are two others with a little more background and comme

There's nothing wrong with the linked Bloomberg article, but it's a little barebones and link-free. Here are two others with a little more background and commentary: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20151016/08010632559/appeals-court-explains-yet-again-to-authors-guild-that-googles-book-scanning-is-fair-use.shtml https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20151016/08010632559/appea... http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/10/appeals-court-rules-that-google-book-scanning-is-fair-use/ http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/10/appeals-court-rul... And the Court's actual written opinion: http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c3458e0a-f3d2-492f-a8b3-6e1121cd5cff/1/doc/13-4829_opn.pdf http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c3458e0a-f3d...