5 ms·
Your statements literally say that. "I know hundreds of recruiters". That's literally what YOU SAID. That's not dumb, or obtuse. You also imply that just beca
by rnovak 11y ago
Your statements literally say that. "I know hundreds of recruiters". That's literally what YOU SAID.
That's not dumb, or obtuse.
You also imply that just because none of those people act like that, that the ENTIRE industry must be the same.
It's getting really difficult to not be offended at some of what you're saying. I'm WASPY as they come and your arguments are so privileged it's not even funny.
- ryguytilidie 11y ago"You also imply that just because none of those people act like that, that the ENTIRE industry must be the same." I never said anything remotely close to the thing you are saying above. Even if I did, the OP said the opposite thing based on a much smaller sample size and of course none of you have any issue with that....? I said that I know hundreds of recruiters and they don't act like this. In contrast, the OP said that he knows a couple recruiters and they do act like this. How on earth could you possibly go with the "yeah, that OP guy is spot on! But man, this other guy who knows way more recruiters and is making the opposite generalization that doesn't make it as easy for us to get mad at faceless strangers is full of shit!" line of logic...? "I'm WASPY as they come and your arguments are so privileged it's not even funny." Huh? What are you referring to? Again, the OP wrote a long rant about how all recruiters should be avoided because a few are bad. I then said I know a lot and that I've had the opposite experience. So, you actually believe that ripping a bunch of faceless strangers is NOT privileged but simply defending them is...? What. The. Fuck?