4 ms·

there are literally millions of recruiters in the world. You think knowing a couple hundred means you know how they all act, or even a majority?

• ryguytilidie 11y ago
  So let me see if I follow. It is completely rational and even considered informational to post some strawmen about 2 or 3 recruiters. HOWEVER, knowing hundreds of recruiters and talking about their actual behavior is not rational. "You think knowing a couple hundred means you know how they all act, or even a majority?" I...what? Are we just coming up with the dumbest, most obtuse questions possible? Again, what shred of your being believes I think this in any way whatsoever?
  • rnovak 11y ago
    Your statements literally say that. "I know hundreds of recruiters". That's literally what YOU SAID. That's not dumb, or obtuse. You also imply that just because none of those people act like that, that the ENTIRE industry must be the same. It's getting really difficult to not be offended at some of what you're saying. I'm WASPY as they come and your arguments are so privileged it's not even funny.
    • ryguytilidie 11y ago
      "You also imply that just because none of those people act like that, that the ENTIRE industry must be the same." I never said anything remotely close to the thing you are saying above. Even if I did, the OP said the opposite thing based on a much smaller sample size and of course none of you have any issue with that....? I said that I know hundreds of recruiters and they don't act like this. In contrast, the OP said that he knows a couple recruiters and they do act like this. How on earth could you possibly go with the "yeah, that OP guy is spot on! But man, this other guy who knows way more recruiters and is making the opposite generalization that doesn't make it as easy for us to get mad at faceless strangers is full of shit!" line of logic...? "I'm WASPY as they come and your arguments are so privileged it's not even funny." Huh? What are you referring to? Again, the OP wrote a long rant about how all recruiters should be avoided because a few are bad. I then said I know a lot and that I've had the opposite experience. So, you actually believe that ripping a bunch of faceless strangers is NOT privileged but simply defending them is...? What. The. Fuck?
  • supercanuck 11y ago
    >So let me see if I follow. You obviously don't, so you may want to give up or try again.
    • ryguytilidie 11y ago
      This is almost as logical as when you implied that I must not know IT exists outside of two companies because I mentioned those two companies... (how did you manage to do this btw? I'm still in awe) The idea that in the end, you not only think that your original point was rational, but you're being snarky and talking down to the person who simply said "I know lots of people in this industry and I've had the opposite opinion of the OP". You seem to get way too much enjoyment from being a snarky dickhead to strangers on the internet for this to be a result of anything other than some issues on your part. Hopefully you fix that.
  • deleted 11y ago
    [deleted]
  • dang 11y ago
    Please stop.
    • deleted 11y ago
      [deleted]
    • deleted 11y ago
      [deleted]
    • deleted 11y ago
      [deleted]
    • ryguytilidie 11y ago
      I get that you're a mod but jesus christ this is rock bottom embarrassing. A user was a completely obtuse shit head toward me and because I kind of mocked them in response, your response is to tell me to shut up? Perhaps its time for a new job?
• ryguytilidie 11y ago
  Curious why you didn't make this response to the OP? All you would have to do is change "a couple hundred" to "a couple"?