3 ms·
It's about consumers and merchants knowing they can trust the brand of the card to be a) accepted everywhere to reduce the complexity of managing multiple credi
by roymurdock 11y ago
It's about consumers and merchants knowing they can trust the brand of the card to be a) accepted everywhere to reduce the complexity of managing multiple credit card accounts and b) fraud-protected so they know they won't have to pick up the tab for losing/having a card stolen.
Having customers view the Visa/Mastercard/Amex "brand" (aka network) in this light is very valuable.
Perks such as cash back, no foreign transaction fees, and miles/points are nice, but they're pretty standard across the different credit tiers of all the major cc providers.
Perhaps having an Amex was once considered prestigious, but speaking for myself and my friends in the mid 20's, credit card providers/payment networks are perceived as largely homogeneous. Nobody cares if you're throwing down an Amex or a Visa to split the Korean BBQ bill. If anything, you'll get a comment of "when are you switching off Amex, their network coverage sucks in Europe".
- treehau5 11y agoI will add my own opinion as a mid 20 year old male myself: My friends and I do not view all cards the same. There are obviously "top tier" versions of each card provider, and those are the ones that are looked at with "Prestige" Whether or not those are Visa, Mastercard, or Amex makes no difference. But if you have a Amex Black, or the metal Chase card with no limit, it does come with opinions.
- roymurdock 11y agoAt the end of the day you're right in that a card sometimes functions status symbol, just a less visible one than say a car. But its strength is weakening, and status can't compete with network coverage and fraud protection functionality. Can't wait for the day when we can do away with physical cards altogether.