> Facebook's counterargument is money. Which argument do you think they support and will listen to? The heavy hand of law! I don't understand why people are so

> Facebook's counterargument is money. Which argument do you think they support and will listen to? The heavy hand of law! I don't understand why people are so worried about introducing regulation. Asking to argue against money is like asking to argue against gun. You can't have a meaningful argument with such an entity, because convincing on arguments assumes the other party is not a psychopath. That aside, there are many options. I think "having a choice" is a good argument. Or they could allow to actually use pseudonym which you could link your real name or not (so the FB would know the connection but other people wouldn't).