3 ms·
> Her principal crime appears to be that she was a bit naive in making overly optimistic promises and embracing the celebrity CEO role, which has made her a tar
by msravi 11y ago
> Her principal crime appears to be that she was a bit naive in making overly optimistic promises and embracing the celebrity CEO role, which has made her a target for schadenfreude.
And the fraud committed in gaming proficiency-testing - does she deserve the benefit of doubt in that too? Is it ok that many people at some point got back erroneous results from their lab tests because of equipment that she knew gave erroneous results?
- jackgavigan 11y agoStrictly speaking, that's an unproven allegation so, on the principle of "innocent until proven guilty", yes, I'm inclined to give the benefit of the doubt. If, on the other hand, it turns out that the allegations are true, then I would hope to see people serving time in jail.