3 ms·
Here is the actual paper: http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/151014/ncomms9581/full/ncomms9581.html http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/151014/ncomms9581/full/nco.
by Herodotus38 11y ago
Here is the actual paper: http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/151014/ncomms9581/full/ncomms9581.html http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/151014/ncomms9581/full/nco...
Coming from medicine I think the title of "medical breakthrough" is too generous. It's a great proof of concept but all this says is that in rats, high Bp in thoracic spinal cord injuries was associated with worse outcomes. Id like to see a follow up on human data from perioperative Bp recordings next. If it still holds true, then you can research whether an intervention in Bp control makes a difference. I'm not a neurosurgeon but I'm sure the correlation btw Bp and sci outcomes has been looked at before
- mtdewcmu 11y agoThe Nature paper uses the phrase "data-driven hypothesis generation," which sounds pretty accurate and consistent with what you're saying.
- jlnielson 11y agoPreliminary evidence has been found in humans, looking at the other end of the spectrum with hypotension. http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/neu.2014.3778 http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/neu.2014.3778 We are now looking at the hypertension relationship in humans, as well as mechanistic studies in rats.