2 ms·
Seems only sporting to also include a link to their PR response to the WSJ article: https://www.theranos.com/news/posts/statement-from-theranos https://www.ther
by OopsCriticality 11y ago
Seems only sporting to also include a link to their PR response to the WSJ article: https://www.theranos.com/news/posts/statement-from-theranos https://www.theranos.com/news/posts/statement-from-theranos
Typical PR drivel. It's also a bit rich to complain about scientific inaccuracy, and boast of opening things up to the FDA, when the Theranos testing platform remains to be thoroughly investigated in the peer-reviewed literature.
- webmasterraj 11y ago> Theranos presented the facts to this reporter to prove the accuracy and reliability of its tests and to directly refute these false allegations, including more than 1,000 pages of statements and documents. Disappointingly, the Journal chose to publish this article without even mentioning the facts Theranos shared that disproved the many falsehoods in the article. Then why doesn't the statement say what these facts are? This reads more like an attack on the former employees who spoke up than a scientific rebuttal of the article. Which leads me to think even more that the article is right.