36 ms·

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_IPCC_Fourth_Assessment_Report https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_IPCC_Fourth_A...

• acqq 11y ago
  The current report is the Fifth from 2014, you link to the entry about some criticisms of the Fourth report completed in 2007 and I don't understand what these mean to you. I don't see anything really significant that disproves the overall conclusions.
  • T-A 11y ago
    > I don't understand what these mean to you They answer your request, > Please any citation of "alarmism" from the real scientists (that is, an example of something such claimed by scientist, that was since disproved and that was believed by more than a few percent of scientists). assuming of course that you stand by your closing statement from that post, > The IPCC reports are the result of the world's climate scientists.
    • acqq 11y ago
      What do you believe was actually a case of "alarmism" in the report from 2007 that was since disproved and that actually makes a difference?
      • T-A 11y ago
        I am sure you are quite capable of clicking the link and reading the items under "Content issues" on your own.
        • acqq 11y ago
          I also assume the same regarding the "Response to criticisms" section. There wasn't anything significant: "there is nothing remotely identified" "that changes the fundamental conclusions about climate change." (from the "open letter from 255 members of the U. S. National Academy of Sciences including 11 Nobel laureates") or "Overall the summary conclusions are considered well founded, none have been found to contain any significant errors."