4 ms·
That's not completely clear. It depends entirely on how often the human is expected to take over
by Lewton 11y ago
That's not completely clear. It depends entirely on how often the human is expected to take over
- TeMPOraL 11y agoBasically, the less often the worse. If it's like once every 5 seconds it's fine. Once every 5 minutes, it's dangerous and annoying. Once every hour is a lethal idea.
- Lewton 11y agoI was thinking more like once every month
- TeMPOraL 11y agoAt this point you have to consider the thing 'Karunamon pointed out upthread. If, for some reason, you can't go full-self-driving and such system is safer on aggregate than having humans drive, then it's a good idea to implement it, even if suddenly handing over control once a month is an incredibly dangerous prospect (because with such timespans, the human will not really be expecting to drive and their skills will have atrophied).
- bobcostas55 11y agoI think a more important factor is what situations the human is expected to take over. Car gets stuck in a cul-de-sac and can't get out? Sure. Impending collision in 2 seconds? Bad idea.