2 ms·
Some things in science have become "immoral" to question. In a big way evolution, including macro evolution, has become the religion of science. If you even ent
by INTPnerd 11y ago
Some things in science have become "immoral" to question. In a big way evolution, including macro evolution, has become the religion of science. If you even entertain the idea that macro evolution has not been happening, you might be labeled an evil heretic. You might be labeled anti-science. You might be laughed out of your field. You could get fired from your job. You might lose all your funding. All of this could happen even if you go about your research, testing, and analysis in a very objective, scientific way.
- minority-one 11y agoAnother sacred artifact in Science is WWII gas chambers. Fred Leuchter (manufacturer of equipment for gas executions), Nicholas Kollerstrom (Science Historian) and Germar Rudolf (Chemist) amongst others, were all outcast and even imprisoned (!) for daring to bring Science into this much politicized subject. No one benefits from censorship. Those listed above should have had their published findings refuted, not censored, if they are wrong. And they should definitely not have been thrown in jail for thought-crimes. Rudolf's published paper was actually peer-reviewed before he lost his PhD research position. This is absolutely outrageous and no one here has the courage to talk about it. It is a travesty and a mockery of what Science should be about.