3 ms·
Ok I'll buy that. The claim is "listings of the code" so several iterations of the code is consistent with that, if superficially misleading.
by robotresearcher 11y ago
Ok I'll buy that. The claim is "listings of the code" so several iterations of the code is consistent with that, if superficially misleading.
- nickpsecurity 11y agoAs will I. Over 1,000+ pages of source is believable and still one hell of an accomplishment at the quality level. I still consider the possibility that the stack included specs of successful or error states given the importance of those for a working program. I know she liked including tons of error handling in everything. Most might have done that with tests but she did it in primary stuff. So, there's room for stuff in there that's not pure source as modern developers would consider.