3 ms·
I think this would come down to the purpose of the safe. If the sole point of the safe can be demonstrated to be defeating law enforcement access then the judg
by click170 11y ago
I think this would come down to the purpose of the safe.
If the sole point of the safe can be demonstrated to be defeating law enforcement access then the judge won't look very kindly on you.
If you can make a reasonable argument that the safe was there to prevent thieves and crooks and safe crackers from getting their hands on the contents, you have a stronger case.
Judges don't take lightly to people trying to skirt the law in "clever" ways.
- johncolanduoni 11y agoThis is easy; you market the safe for the storage of trade secret documents. Getting back to the original issue, Apple can (and does) claim it offers encryption with no backdoors because a backdoor would give hackers a way to get in.
- click170 11y agoThis has always seemed like a moot point to me when the government can demand that they install a backdoor at any point in the future under a gag order. Though this is true for any company anywhere basically.