3 ms·
I browsed through the email thread briefly and it looks like a lot of "political ideology vs technical purism" drama... Seems high stress. Looks like after som
by mfoy_ 11y ago
I browsed through the email thread briefly and it looks like a lot of "political ideology vs technical purism" drama... Seems high stress.
Looks like after some hearty back and forth it settled down: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-10/msg00430.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-10/msg00...
Although it seems they ended up on an "agree to disagree" finale: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-10/msg00543.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-10/msg00...
- masklinn 11y ago> it looks like a lot of "political ideology vs technical purism" drama… That's pretty much the history of the FSF and the GNU projects considering they were created for political/ideological reasons (the Unix in "GNU's Not Unix" is nonfree/encumbered AT&T UNIX, and the ideological underpinnings are what allowed Linux to overtake BSD during "the troubles" of the early 90s). The pulls ideological and technical pulls have oft conflicted.
- hga 11y agothe ideological underpinnings are what allowed Linux to overtake BSD during "the troubles" of the early 90s As I understood it, also to a degree witnessing it as it happened, this lawsuit spiked BSD at the critical period: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNIX_System_Laboratories,_Inc._v._Berkeley_Software_Design,_Inc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNIX_System_Laboratories,_Inc..... It certainly took Linux a long time to get in the ballpark of quality that BSD started out with at the gate, including the standard TCP/IP stack most everyone used, including Microsoft (initially, at least).
- hga 11y agoOops, HN cuts the canonical URL's last character, a period; try this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USL_v._BSDI https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USL_v._BSDI