3 ms·
I think it's a step backwards if platform specific containers like Capsule pick up. Nodeck and Gontainer next? It's more productive to develop general containe
by vardump 11y ago
I think it's a step backwards if platform specific containers like Capsule pick up. Nodeck and Gontainer next?
It's more productive to develop general containers that solve issues with logging etc. for all platforms, not for just one.
- pron 11y agoDocker isn't a container -- it's a packaging solution for containers. Capsule is another packaging solution that can be launched in the same kind of container. Also, the JVM isn't a platform; it's the biggest platform by a very wide margin for server-side applications. So the containers are still general, and you use them for all platforms and they all interoperate. I just see no sense in requiring an extra, inconvenient packaging step for a platform that already packages applications well.
- jacques_chester 11y agoWhat you're asking for is a PaaS. For those wanting Docker support, Cloud Foundry and OpenShift Origin are available. For those who also want Buildpacks, Cloud Foundry supports that out of the box. Disclaimer (deep breath): I previously worked on the CF Buildpacks team, and I work for Pivotal Labs, a division of Pivotal, the company which donates the majority of engineering effort to Cloud Foundry.