3 ms·
All of the above companies are asset managers, not principal investors (even MS in this context). Meaning that they don't benefit from a stronger Twitter, but t
by MagnumOpus 11y ago
All of the above companies are asset managers, not principal investors (even MS in this context). Meaning that they don't benefit from a stronger Twitter, but the individual investors and pension accounts who own their ETFs and index funds do.
You might have a point if rich people's investment vehicles (like hedge funds, private equity or venture funds) owned the majority of TWTR - but they don't, as you showed.
- cwilkes 11y agoAll of the above companies are asset managers, not principal investors (even MS in this context) And what happens if those asset managers lose money year after year or don't keep up with others?