3 ms·
That was my guess as well, that nudity inhibits "shareability", which is important for traffic nowadays for this kind of publication. Though if this was an over
by _delirium 11y ago
That was my guess as well, that nudity inhibits "shareability", which is important for traffic nowadays for this kind of publication. Though if this was an overhaul aimed at getting more pageviews by a younger audience, it's also likely there were other content changes at the same time, like type of article being written, which might have contributed as much or more.
- maxerickson 11y agoThe NYT article does mention that they made the change with the intent of making their site more Facebook friendly.