3 ms·

Some problems with the report is that it was written by Dutch and Ukrainian people, which might not be totally objective. Additionally, large parts of the repor

by wsc981 11y ago

Some problems with the report is that it was written by Dutch and Ukrainian people, which might not be totally objective. Additionally, large parts of the report isn't open for everyone to see. I think it's strange to accept a conclusion without being able to see everything that caused the researches to come to their conclusion. Finally, when the report was revealed the press wasn't allowed to ask any questions.

KaiserPro 11y ago
I suspect the reason why they wernt allowed to ask questions is because the report only lays out a time line of of events. Not the political reasons or motivations behind those events. Plus if we are going to be honest, the report is more than detailed enough.
tremon 11y ago
The full report is http://cdn.onderzoeksraad.nl/documents/report-mh17-crash-en.pdf http://cdn.onderzoeksraad.nl/documents/report-mh17-crash-en.... Which parts are missing according to you?
ceejayoz 11y ago
> Some problems with the report is that it was written by Dutch and Ukrainian people, which might not be totally objective. Which is why the report includes both "factual information" and "analysis" sections. Feel free to contest specific points in their analysis you object to. > Finally, when the report was revealed the press wasn't allowed to ask any questions. Probably because 99% of the questions they'd ask would be answered by reading the report. It's not like the reporters can't read it and email their questions in a few hours later.
drzaiusapelord 11y ago
Well, the world wanted a tribunal at the UN but Russia veto'd it. http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/29/us-ukraine-crisis-mh17-un-idUSKCN0Q32GS20150729 http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/29/us-ukraine-crisis-... Its clear that Russia sees guilt here and anything it can do to confuse people and make people think like you (see! Its all biased, wake up sheeple!) is part of their disinformation strategy. Sadly, this stuff works.
ptico 11y ago
> The investigation team consists of 24 investigators with members from Ukraine, Malaysia, Australia, Germany, the United States, the United Kingdom and Russia. Please, read the sources before making this type of comments.

by wsc981 11y ago

KaiserPro 11y ago

I suspect the reason why they wernt allowed to ask questions is because the report only lays out a time line of of events. Not the political reasons or motivations behind those events. Plus if we are going to be honest, the report is more than detailed enough.

tremon 11y ago

The full report is http://cdn.onderzoeksraad.nl/documents/report-mh17-crash-en.pdf http://cdn.onderzoeksraad.nl/documents/report-mh17-crash-en.... Which parts are missing according to you?

ceejayoz 11y ago

> Some problems with the report is that it was written by Dutch and Ukrainian people, which might not be totally objective. Which is why the report includes both "factual information" and "analysis" sections. Feel free to contest specific points in their analysis you object to. > Finally, when the report was revealed the press wasn't allowed to ask any questions. Probably because 99% of the questions they'd ask would be answered by reading the report. It's not like the reporters can't read it and email their questions in a few hours later.

drzaiusapelord 11y ago

Well, the world wanted a tribunal at the UN but Russia veto'd it. http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/29/us-ukraine-crisis-mh17-un-idUSKCN0Q32GS20150729 http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/29/us-ukraine-crisis-... Its clear that Russia sees guilt here and anything it can do to confuse people and make people think like you (see! Its all biased, wake up sheeple!) is part of their disinformation strategy. Sadly, this stuff works.

ptico 11y ago

> The investigation team consists of 24 investigators with members from Ukraine, Malaysia, Australia, Germany, the United States, the United Kingdom and Russia. Please, read the sources before making this type of comments.