3 ms·
I've heard the same thing about the Afx macros and the plan for another more ambitious framework. In my opinion the biggest obstacles for MFC were: * a pretty
by brusch64 11y ago
I've heard the same thing about the Afx macros and the plan for another more ambitious framework.
In my opinion the biggest obstacles for MFC were:
* a pretty bad C++ compiler (the first good MS C++ compiler was the one with Visual Studio 2003 as much as i remember)
* that the core group were "old school" C guys that either couldn't design a better object oriented system or thought that it would be to hard for the "normal" developers
- pjmlp 11y agoJust decided to do a bit of archaeology. The macros in the Windows 3.1 SDK were the strict header mode and message crackers. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/83456 https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/83456 It made my life sane every time I had to use C instead of C++, and yet very few people knew about them. Petzold never mentioned them in his books, I discovered them by chance in another book. Nice to know that the Afx story might have not been a rumour, since other people heard the same. My first Visual C++ was v5.0, by then it was already clear that Borland was on they way out as first choice. Sadly.