4 ms·
Your statement is suspiciously worded, because all forms of motorized transport, public or private, are deeply subsidized around here. Shouldn't the first subs
by thrownaway2424 11y ago
Your statement is suspiciously worded, because all forms of motorized transport, public or private, are deeply subsidized around here. Shouldn't the first subsidy to be reduced be the one lavished upon private cars?
- khuey 11y agoI agree that all forms of motorized transport are heavily subsidized. We're already subsidizing the highways, gas, lack of pricing of externalities such as air pollution, etc. Given all that, why should taxpayers further subsidize the vehicle itself and the operator, instead of letting Google pay for all of that?