4 ms·
No, you repeated Coward's own assertion, stripped of its original context.
by caskance 11y ago
No, you repeated Coward's own assertion, stripped of its original context.
- argonaut 11y agoThis is a non sequitur. (more specifically: we weren't arguing about my first assertion, we were arguing about my second assertion. So the fact that you're trying to refute my second assertion, that there is no evidence he have out A's more freely, by attacking my first assertion, is irrelevant. I fully acknowledge that absent the department's response, we don't have the full picture of whether or not the department's issue was with the actual teaching content, but that was not what you and I were discussing)