4 ms·
This article pretty conclusively convinced me that systemd is actually good, if these are the strongest arguments against it. Most of the dependency-related st
by Jweb_Guru 11y ago
This article pretty conclusively convinced me that systemd is actually good, if these are the strongest arguments against it. Most of the dependency-related stuff (process order related, cyclicstuff) seems eminently fixable. I found his arguments about dependency management having to be linearizable highly unconvincing.
- sagichmal 11y ago> I found his arguments about dependency management having to be linearizable highly unconvincing. What? Can you expand on this? To me it rang as a well-reasoned, and pretty devastating, critique.
- 9mit3t2m9h9a 11y agoThese are the strongest argument against its core service management logic; those that explain why it is not better than Upstart (or daemontools or s6+s6-rc …) And systemd causes problems not only by this, but also by its bundling of similarly mediocre or worse other components.