i don't have much of a reason to believe that breakthroughs need to be regular, since by nature they are unpredictable. in a monstrously reductive sense, I fee

i don't have much of a reason to believe that breakthroughs need to be regular, since by nature they are unpredictable. in a monstrously reductive sense, I feel like this article is analyzing a series of coin flips and commenting on a streak of tails. it doesn't help that the scope of the topic is far broader than could be covered in the given text, and entire fields were ignored out of existence. in all, I was entertained, so I'm happy.