> If more Jews could revolt the final solution might not have happened, not in the way it did anyhow, Your conclusion is a bit tautological - if things were di

> If more Jews could revolt the final solution might not have happened, not in the way it did anyhow, Your conclusion is a bit tautological - if things were different then they wouldn't have happened the same way. > the Germans could only execute it because they have had very little internal and external resistance in doing so. Jews were not the only ones being killed. Everything you say should apply to Ukraine. Quoting Wikipedia: > The Holocaust in Ukraine took place during the occupation of Ukraine by Nazi Germany.[1] Between 1941 and 1945, approximately 3,000,000 Ukrainian and other non-Jewish victims were killed as part of Nazi extermination policies, along with between 850,000 - 900,000 Jews who lived in the territory of modern Ukraine.[2][3] Original plans of genocide called for the extermination of 65% of the nation's 23.2 million Ukrainians,[4][5] with the remainder of inhabitants to be treated as slaves.[6] Over 2,300,000 Ukrainians were deported to Germany for slave labor.[7] In ten years' time, the plan effectively called for the extermination, expulsion, Germanization or enslavement of most or all Ukrainians. ... > One of Hitler's ambitions at the start of the war was to exterminate, expel, or enslave most or all Slavs from their native lands so as to make living space for German settlers. ... Total civilian losses during the war and German occupation in Ukraine are estimated at four million, including up to a million Jews who were murdered by the Einsatzgruppen and local Nazi collaborators. > If there was a much bigger Jewish resistance and there would be revolts in every work camp, ghetto and concentration camp the Germans could possible have had to give up on their plans, Given that millions of non-Jewish Slavs were also massacred, how much more Jewish resistance would have been needed? And like I said, if that thesis were true, then it would seem that the best way to achieve the two state solution for Palestine is to ship a huge amount of arms to the Palestinians. If not, what is missing in the comparison?