I wonder if the person who wrote this article understand patents, at all. I don't see any indication of that. He seems to be implying something untoward happene

I wonder if the person who wrote this article understand patents, at all. I don't see any indication of that. He seems to be implying something untoward happened. EDIT: I didn't see the comments before (they take a while to load) - the first comment on the article sums things up pretty well I think.