You repeatedly appeal to one specific irrationality, and don't explain why that irrational behavior (as opposed to many others) will occur. Nor do you explain

You repeatedly appeal to one specific irrationality, and don't explain why that irrational behavior (as opposed to many others) will occur. Nor do you explain why redistribution is necessary. Assuming the masses can control law enforcement well enough to impose redistribution, why can't the masses also simply prevent the rich from harming them and form their own economy? Let me guess - more finely tuned irrationality? It seems like your alleged irrationalities conspire in odd ways to make your very specific policy prescription the only possible solution. [edit: my mistake on this paragraph, I did indeed confuse you with another poster.]