6 ms·

Learn to stop using shiny new things and love MySQL

56 points by nreece 11y ago

CurtMonash 11y ago
Oddly, Pinterest is a flagship user of HBase.
- capkutay 11y ago
  Maybe they're just referring to transactional scenarios?
inanutshellus 11y ago
A couple years ago I built a very robust and intricate virtual inventory system for integrating with third-party vendors. I created two accessible endpoints: one highly customizeable webservice endpoint (I'll literally take any valid XML and work with you to transform it into what I need), and one luddite-friendly SFTP server supporting extraordinarily simple export-from-excel XML output. I was raked over the coals for providing the SFTP/Excel solution, "FTP?! What is this, the '80s?" was the quote that sticks with me. Almost all of our vendors turned out to be small shops. Only two of our dozens of vendors use the webservice, even as easy-like-Sunday-morning as it is. Everyone else uses the Excel solution. It's hard to let yourself write the uncool solution that actually fits the bill.
- RyJones 11y ago
  One of our data providers at MSN gave us this binary blob, which we had a decoder to run over and produce a text file, which we then transformed in something regular, did a diff, and updated the table we needed to update via SQL. We begged and begged for XML support. Many releases on, they trumpeted XML support! Huzzah! The XML had a header and one huge CDATA block of the Base64 encoded blob they usually sent. Thanks!
- kyllo 11y ago
  I work a Fortune 500 company in an industry where FTP and EDI are the norm, and SOAP/XML is considered fancy. Half the time our customers (many of whom are other F500 companies) think that all that stuff is too hard or expensive, and prefer to just e-mail us an Excel spreadsheet every day. Enough so that we recently introduced a new service offering where a customer can e-mail their spreadsheet of data to one of our employees, who will upload it to our system for them once a week. This is just how IT works in most businesses.
dpratt 11y ago
I agree, I've found through painful experience that the shiny and new, while incredibly fun, tends to cost more than it's worth. With that said, if you're going to take the prudent route and use an established database platform, why in the name of all that is holy would you pick MySQL over Postgres? Granted, I am rather biased, but I do have extensive experience using both in anger. Every time I have to use MySQL I walk away with the impression that it was built with the same design mentality that PHP was. The whole point of a transactional RDBMS is to keep your data as consistent and accurate as possible. I cannot in good faith use a database that (silently!) will coerce badly formatted input into what it thinks should be in the column.
- philliphaydon 11y ago
  I don't know why anyone in 2015 would pick mysql when postgres is an option. Live postgres. So nice to work with. It's json support is amazing too
  - nchelluri 11y ago
    You know what, about two weeks ago I was starting a new Rails hobby project, and I thought "all I've heard about for the past year is how everyone loves Postgres", and was about to throw it in there, when I saw a link to Google search trends comparing the two, and MySQL is still so far ahead: https://www.google.com/trends/explore#cmpt=q&q=mysql,+postgresql https://www.google.com/trends/explore#cmpt=q&q=mysql,+postgr... It's quite possible this is just due to people supporting existing applications, but I dunno, I am tempted to stick with MySQL for new stuff for the next little while.
    - 0942v8653 11y ago
      It seems weird to me that Postgres and MySQL are both going down. I'd expect interest in Postgres to be rising at the very least—what are people switching to?
      - tracker1 11y ago
baldfat 11y ago
Relational Databases still rule the roost for almost every possible problem minus a handful of instances. Personally I would go the Fork of MariaDB or my prefer DB of Postgres.
cdelsolar 11y ago
I understand what you're saying but please replace MySQL with Postgres. Only one of those two is an actual consistent database.
- hardwaresofton 11y ago
  Agree -- I hope people don't still consider Postgres to be "shiny and new"
oneJob 11y ago
Please do not use MySQL,,, unless you've read the it's dual licenses. MariaDB was forked for good reason. MariaDB > MySQL
- Ologn 11y ago
  I agree. Also, MariaDB is being actively developed. A lot of Linux distributions are defaulting to MariaDB. The recent release of Debian stable (jessie) has MariaDB. So far I've only been using it on new machines, but I may even migrate my existing MySQL servers to MariaDB.
hanlec 11y ago
> Some technology is designed for massive scale and some is not. You may have to layer a little scale magic on top. This is as wrong as saying that everyone needs to scale day one.
ksec 11y ago
There are lots of love for MySQL, especially from Facebook and Pinterest. I wish the same for PostgreSQL
no1youknowz 11y ago
How big is the team over at pinterest managing the MySQL infrastructure? I think this is the big difference here. I have a particular project. The database has well over 1 billion rows in multiple tables which need joins to generate complex reporting. As the only tech here, there is only so much I can be working on. Before... time spent on trying to get MySQL to work, was time not well spent. I spent countless hours on IRC talking to devs on #mysql/#mariadb and was told many times, you seem to have the indexes in the right places and the query was well written, you are lucky you are getting it that fast. Sure, if I had a huge team like Instgram (who I think sharded mysql) and Pinterest. I could assign dbas to get my MySQL infrastructure to scale and possibly fork my application to work different. I even called Percona and Mariadb and was given pricing from $50 to $70k to work the issue. Note, that they didn't even promise to resolve it. They needed between $10 to $20k up front to check my schema and the data and then the other sum to do the work. Really, almost $100k and no concrete answer? So I don't have a team and I didn't employ Percona/Mariadb to help solve my issue. Instead, I did something completely different. Some may even say drastic. I need something simple, that will work with the 5x9's and is very robust. So instead, I went to Postgres. I ran to Postgres. I ran and didn't look back. With Postgres, 80% of my issues went away. PG 9.5 has some features that ALL of my issues will go away and I may be able to have quarterly queries of 10b rows with multiple tables in under 2 seconds. Cloudflare is currently doing it and I'm trying to replicate it. Bottom line is this. MySQL for me, was a dead end. Postgres seems to every year go from strength to strength. Postgres isn't shiny. It's dependable, actually cares what you are putting in the database. Makes your schema simple because you can go from var(x)/int(x) to text/int and it's still fast. I've converted about 10 other dbas who were used to MySQL and thought PG was hard, to switch over. Now, like me. They won't look back. If you are still using MySQL. Take a look at Postgres. MySQL has lost it's shine. It's now dull. Fingers crossed PG 9.6 comes with MPP capability. That would really blow the doors off!
- clessg 11y ago
  I agree. MySQL has been one problem after another. Postgres isn't perfect either, but it is constantly improving and normally does the right thing. The idea of Postgres being a "shiny new toy" is... an interesting viewpoint.
deleted 11y ago
[deleted]
Demiurge 11y ago
Overall a good point, but MySQL auto increment sequences and other bugs have given me corrupt state many times, yet good old yet shiny PostgreSQL has caused zero problems over more than 10 years, yet keeps gaining features. I have been using hstore more lately, and PostGIS is hard to match.
chad_strategic 11y ago
OMG, that article had some serious common sense.
- chad_strategic 11y ago
  Dam, always getting down voting for stating an opinion. What's up with that. (By the way, I actually read the article.)
  - vixen99 11y ago
    The correct response is not to give a damn about something so arbitrary.
    - chad_strategic 11y ago
      You are absolutely correct. I blame it on a temporary lapse of reason. (I usually don't run with the herd, so this shouldn't be a surprise to me...)
  - jeremysmyth 11y ago
    Probably because your comment didn't add anything to the discussion. There's somewhat of a culture here of downvoting "Me too" or "+1" type content-free comments, and even jokey one-liners that don't progress the discussion. My respectful suggestion is that when you want to comment, try to say something that uses your own experience or opinion to add something to the discussion, rather than to mirror or agree with some point in the article or in a comment. I'm far more likely to upvote something that makes me realize something I hadn't already thought of.
davidbarker 11y ago
As someone who's only briefly looked into Postgres, are there any disadvantages to going with it instead of MySQL? It seems (especially from the comments here) that Postgres is something to seriously consider in future projects, but I'm wondering if there are any reasons to stick with MySQL.
- spudlyo 11y ago
  I've answered this question once before, and this is what I wrote. MySQL is battle tested and operationally sane to manage at scale; I'm talking specifically about replication. I've been a DBA for thousands of MySQL hosts in production and just a handful of PostgreSQL clusters, so I'm not a PostgreSQL expert by any stretch. These PostgreSQL machines were also inherited from a company we acquired, so some of my negative impressions can likely be explained by them being set up poorly, which sadly seems to be the norm. PostgreSQL's replication has evolved slowly over the years, and as a result it's idiosyncratic, complicated to get right, and hard to generalize about. There aren't a lot of great setup guides and tutorials on the subject either. Postgres replication works by shipping WAL (transaction/redo) logs to slaves, and the slaves are in a constant state of DB recovery. Streaming replication does so as writes happen, and file based log shipping copies the logs when the 16MB segment is complete. Ours were set up to use streaming replication, without having a separate file-based archive log host to use to fetch older logs. Whenever the write load became too much and the slaves could no longer keep up with the master WAL logs on the master would expire and replication would break entirely, requiring you to rebuild all your slaves from backup. This was my introduction to PG replication. WAL logs were also applied without checksums or verification which corrupted the entire replication chain, and as I remember we didn't discover this until the corrupt pages got hit by a query. Software upgrades with PG seemed to be a huge pain as well, we could never figure out how long they were going to take, and even if the on-disk formats didn't change, somehow all the cardinality stats on our tables disappeared, and all our query plans went to shit until we ran some process to rebuild them, which took days. Operationally there were some things that made our team angry. We couldn't figure out how to reparent a slave without completely re-cloning it from the new parent, even though it was completely up to date from the authoritative master at the time of the reparenting. Also, do you really have to take down the entire cluster to change max connections on a slave? Many such settings seemed to not be dynamic and must remain in sync across the entire chain. One of the things people seem to love about PG is how correct and proper it is respecting the sanctity of your data. As an ops person I'd much rather deal with slightly inconsistent replicas (common in MySQL) than have to fight with how rigid PG is.
mundanevoice 11y ago
Postgres FTW, with native JSON support it is the best RDBMS out there.
latenightcoding 11y ago
In some cases using shiny new things does give you some type of advantage over bigger companies that are not willing to take the risk. That being said, when it comes to choosing a database developers should stick to mature technology with a non-restrictive license aka Postgres
famousactress 11y ago
I haven't used Java in a while, but does Oracle still run around extorting folks for using the JDBC license? I'm curious. Frankly I don't have any really serious problem with mysql other than it's ownership and speed of improvement. Plausibly MariaDB sorts that out but I agree with other commenters that at this point Postgres seems like the best choice for most new projects.
houssc 11y ago
You have no idea how many developers I've wanted to hit in the testicles with a baseball bat for crying my ear off to use redis, mongo, etc... anything but mysql. Really you want to take our 99% relational data (billing/invoicing, crm, etc...) and put it in a key store? You're fucking retarded. What I found is that I can browse the posts here in the AM and then by noon they will be asking me for whatever landed on the front page here. I just laugh and tell them to go back to work.
thaumaturgy 11y ago
Some similar articles and threads: - Choose Boring Technology: http://mcfunley.com/choose-boring-technology http://mcfunley.com/choose-boring-technology, comments at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9291215 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9291215 - Chasing the Shiny and New: https://www.nemil.com/musings/shinyandnew.html https://www.nemil.com/musings/shinyandnew.html, discussion at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10279008 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10279008 - Tech is moving too fast for me, I'm out: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7947551 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7947551 etc. I especially liked the first one, which described the idea of "innovation tokens": every startup or project gets three innovation tokens. If you decide to use a new development language, you've just spent one. A new framework, you've just spent another, and so on. If you spend more than three, your chances of launching reach epsilon. I find that as I'm getting to be an older (and older, sigh...) developer, I'm also more and more reluctant to keep throwing away all of the knowledge and hard-won skills I've developed in favor of picking up new ones. It seems enormously, almost criminally wasteful. How many times should I throw away tens of thousands of lines of code in polished, battle-tested libraries, and knowledge of edge cases and gotchas and little efficiencies and everything else, so that I can start over again with a blank slate and a new language and a long road of new bugs and edge cases to learn? No other industry is as wasteful in terms of talent expended than ours is. Imagine if every single bridge ever built in this country was torn down and replaced every five years with a new bridge that featured new materials and new technology.
jburwell 11y ago
%s/MySQL/PostgreSQL/ and I violently agree with this article.
macavity23 11y ago
Oh my gods, I can't up vote this enough. This should be mandatory reading before one is allowed to use a text editor. Though PostgreSQL is as good a choice as MySQL. Technically better (AIUI) but with a less gigantic support base.

56 points by nreece 11y ago

CurtMonash 11y ago

Oddly, Pinterest is a flagship user of HBase.

capkutay 11y ago
Maybe they're just referring to transactional scenarios?

inanutshellus 11y ago

A couple years ago I built a very robust and intricate virtual inventory system for integrating with third-party vendors. I created two accessible endpoints: one highly customizeable webservice endpoint (I'll literally take any valid XML and work with you to transform it into what I need), and one luddite-friendly SFTP server supporting extraordinarily simple export-from-excel XML output. I was raked over the coals for providing the SFTP/Excel solution, "FTP?! What is this, the '80s?" was the quote that sticks with me. Almost all of our vendors turned out to be small shops. Only two of our dozens of vendors use the webservice, even as easy-like-Sunday-morning as it is. Everyone else uses the Excel solution. It's hard to let yourself write the uncool solution that actually fits the bill.

RyJones 11y ago
One of our data providers at MSN gave us this binary blob, which we had a decoder to run over and produce a text file, which we then transformed in something regular, did a diff, and updated the table we needed to update via SQL. We begged and begged for XML support. Many releases on, they trumpeted XML support! Huzzah! The XML had a header and one huge CDATA block of the Base64 encoded blob they usually sent. Thanks!
kyllo 11y ago
I work a Fortune 500 company in an industry where FTP and EDI are the norm, and SOAP/XML is considered fancy. Half the time our customers (many of whom are other F500 companies) think that all that stuff is too hard or expensive, and prefer to just e-mail us an Excel spreadsheet every day. Enough so that we recently introduced a new service offering where a customer can e-mail their spreadsheet of data to one of our employees, who will upload it to our system for them once a week. This is just how IT works in most businesses.

dpratt 11y ago

I agree, I've found through painful experience that the shiny and new, while incredibly fun, tends to cost more than it's worth. With that said, if you're going to take the prudent route and use an established database platform, why in the name of all that is holy would you pick MySQL over Postgres? Granted, I am rather biased, but I do have extensive experience using both in anger. Every time I have to use MySQL I walk away with the impression that it was built with the same design mentality that PHP was. The whole point of a transactional RDBMS is to keep your data as consistent and accurate as possible. I cannot in good faith use a database that (silently!) will coerce badly formatted input into what it thinks should be in the column.

philliphaydon 11y ago
I don't know why anyone in 2015 would pick mysql when postgres is an option. Live postgres. So nice to work with. It's json support is amazing too
- nchelluri 11y ago
  You know what, about two weeks ago I was starting a new Rails hobby project, and I thought "all I've heard about for the past year is how everyone loves Postgres", and was about to throw it in there, when I saw a link to Google search trends comparing the two, and MySQL is still so far ahead: https://www.google.com/trends/explore#cmpt=q&q=mysql,+postgresql https://www.google.com/trends/explore#cmpt=q&q=mysql,+postgr... It's quite possible this is just due to people supporting existing applications, but I dunno, I am tempted to stick with MySQL for new stuff for the next little while.
  - 0942v8653 11y ago
    It seems weird to me that Postgres and MySQL are both going down. I'd expect interest in Postgres to be rising at the very least—what are people switching to?
    - tracker1 11y ago

baldfat 11y ago

Relational Databases still rule the roost for almost every possible problem minus a handful of instances. Personally I would go the Fork of MariaDB or my prefer DB of Postgres.

cdelsolar 11y ago

I understand what you're saying but please replace MySQL with Postgres. Only one of those two is an actual consistent database.

hardwaresofton 11y ago
Agree -- I hope people don't still consider Postgres to be "shiny and new"

oneJob 11y ago

Please do not use MySQL,,, unless you've read the it's dual licenses. MariaDB was forked for good reason. MariaDB > MySQL

Ologn 11y ago
I agree. Also, MariaDB is being actively developed. A lot of Linux distributions are defaulting to MariaDB. The recent release of Debian stable (jessie) has MariaDB. So far I've only been using it on new machines, but I may even migrate my existing MySQL servers to MariaDB.

hanlec 11y ago

> Some technology is designed for massive scale and some is not. You may have to layer a little scale magic on top. This is as wrong as saying that everyone needs to scale day one.

ksec 11y ago

There are lots of love for MySQL, especially from Facebook and Pinterest. I wish the same for PostgreSQL

no1youknowz 11y ago

How big is the team over at pinterest managing the MySQL infrastructure? I think this is the big difference here. I have a particular project. The database has well over 1 billion rows in multiple tables which need joins to generate complex reporting. As the only tech here, there is only so much I can be working on. Before... time spent on trying to get MySQL to work, was time not well spent. I spent countless hours on IRC talking to devs on #mysql/#mariadb and was told many times, you seem to have the indexes in the right places and the query was well written, you are lucky you are getting it that fast. Sure, if I had a huge team like Instgram (who I think sharded mysql) and Pinterest. I could assign dbas to get my MySQL infrastructure to scale and possibly fork my application to work different. I even called Percona and Mariadb and was given pricing from $50 to $70k to work the issue. Note, that they didn't even promise to resolve it. They needed between $10 to $20k up front to check my schema and the data and then the other sum to do the work. Really, almost $100k and no concrete answer? So I don't have a team and I didn't employ Percona/Mariadb to help solve my issue. Instead, I did something completely different. Some may even say drastic. I need something simple, that will work with the 5x9's and is very robust. So instead, I went to Postgres. I ran to Postgres. I ran and didn't look back. With Postgres, 80% of my issues went away. PG 9.5 has some features that ALL of my issues will go away and I may be able to have quarterly queries of 10b rows with multiple tables in under 2 seconds. Cloudflare is currently doing it and I'm trying to replicate it. Bottom line is this. MySQL for me, was a dead end. Postgres seems to every year go from strength to strength. Postgres isn't shiny. It's dependable, actually cares what you are putting in the database. Makes your schema simple because you can go from var(x)/int(x) to text/int and it's still fast. I've converted about 10 other dbas who were used to MySQL and thought PG was hard, to switch over. Now, like me. They won't look back. If you are still using MySQL. Take a look at Postgres. MySQL has lost it's shine. It's now dull. Fingers crossed PG 9.6 comes with MPP capability. That would really blow the doors off!

clessg 11y ago
I agree. MySQL has been one problem after another. Postgres isn't perfect either, but it is constantly improving and normally does the right thing. The idea of Postgres being a "shiny new toy" is... an interesting viewpoint.

deleted 11y ago

[deleted]

Demiurge 11y ago

Overall a good point, but MySQL auto increment sequences and other bugs have given me corrupt state many times, yet good old yet shiny PostgreSQL has caused zero problems over more than 10 years, yet keeps gaining features. I have been using hstore more lately, and PostGIS is hard to match.

chad_strategic 11y ago

OMG, that article had some serious common sense.

chad_strategic 11y ago
Dam, always getting down voting for stating an opinion. What's up with that. (By the way, I actually read the article.)
- vixen99 11y ago
  The correct response is not to give a damn about something so arbitrary.
  - chad_strategic 11y ago
    You are absolutely correct. I blame it on a temporary lapse of reason. (I usually don't run with the herd, so this shouldn't be a surprise to me...)
- jeremysmyth 11y ago
  Probably because your comment didn't add anything to the discussion. There's somewhat of a culture here of downvoting "Me too" or "+1" type content-free comments, and even jokey one-liners that don't progress the discussion. My respectful suggestion is that when you want to comment, try to say something that uses your own experience or opinion to add something to the discussion, rather than to mirror or agree with some point in the article or in a comment. I'm far more likely to upvote something that makes me realize something I hadn't already thought of.

davidbarker 11y ago

As someone who's only briefly looked into Postgres, are there any disadvantages to going with it instead of MySQL? It seems (especially from the comments here) that Postgres is something to seriously consider in future projects, but I'm wondering if there are any reasons to stick with MySQL.

spudlyo 11y ago
I've answered this question once before, and this is what I wrote. MySQL is battle tested and operationally sane to manage at scale; I'm talking specifically about replication. I've been a DBA for thousands of MySQL hosts in production and just a handful of PostgreSQL clusters, so I'm not a PostgreSQL expert by any stretch. These PostgreSQL machines were also inherited from a company we acquired, so some of my negative impressions can likely be explained by them being set up poorly, which sadly seems to be the norm. PostgreSQL's replication has evolved slowly over the years, and as a result it's idiosyncratic, complicated to get right, and hard to generalize about. There aren't a lot of great setup guides and tutorials on the subject either. Postgres replication works by shipping WAL (transaction/redo) logs to slaves, and the slaves are in a constant state of DB recovery. Streaming replication does so as writes happen, and file based log shipping copies the logs when the 16MB segment is complete. Ours were set up to use streaming replication, without having a separate file-based archive log host to use to fetch older logs. Whenever the write load became too much and the slaves could no longer keep up with the master WAL logs on the master would expire and replication would break entirely, requiring you to rebuild all your slaves from backup. This was my introduction to PG replication. WAL logs were also applied without checksums or verification which corrupted the entire replication chain, and as I remember we didn't discover this until the corrupt pages got hit by a query. Software upgrades with PG seemed to be a huge pain as well, we could never figure out how long they were going to take, and even if the on-disk formats didn't change, somehow all the cardinality stats on our tables disappeared, and all our query plans went to shit until we ran some process to rebuild them, which took days. Operationally there were some things that made our team angry. We couldn't figure out how to reparent a slave without completely re-cloning it from the new parent, even though it was completely up to date from the authoritative master at the time of the reparenting. Also, do you really have to take down the entire cluster to change max connections on a slave? Many such settings seemed to not be dynamic and must remain in sync across the entire chain. One of the things people seem to love about PG is how correct and proper it is respecting the sanctity of your data. As an ops person I'd much rather deal with slightly inconsistent replicas (common in MySQL) than have to fight with how rigid PG is.

mundanevoice 11y ago

Postgres FTW, with native JSON support it is the best RDBMS out there.

latenightcoding 11y ago

In some cases using shiny new things does give you some type of advantage over bigger companies that are not willing to take the risk. That being said, when it comes to choosing a database developers should stick to mature technology with a non-restrictive license aka Postgres

famousactress 11y ago

I haven't used Java in a while, but does Oracle still run around extorting folks for using the JDBC license? I'm curious. Frankly I don't have any really serious problem with mysql other than it's ownership and speed of improvement. Plausibly MariaDB sorts that out but I agree with other commenters that at this point Postgres seems like the best choice for most new projects.

houssc 11y ago

You have no idea how many developers I've wanted to hit in the testicles with a baseball bat for crying my ear off to use redis, mongo, etc... anything but mysql. Really you want to take our 99% relational data (billing/invoicing, crm, etc...) and put it in a key store? You're fucking retarded. What I found is that I can browse the posts here in the AM and then by noon they will be asking me for whatever landed on the front page here. I just laugh and tell them to go back to work.

thaumaturgy 11y ago

Some similar articles and threads: - Choose Boring Technology: http://mcfunley.com/choose-boring-technology http://mcfunley.com/choose-boring-technology, comments at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9291215 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9291215 - Chasing the Shiny and New: https://www.nemil.com/musings/shinyandnew.html https://www.nemil.com/musings/shinyandnew.html, discussion at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10279008 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10279008 - Tech is moving too fast for me, I'm out: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7947551 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7947551 etc. I especially liked the first one, which described the idea of "innovation tokens": every startup or project gets three innovation tokens. If you decide to use a new development language, you've just spent one. A new framework, you've just spent another, and so on. If you spend more than three, your chances of launching reach epsilon. I find that as I'm getting to be an older (and older, sigh...) developer, I'm also more and more reluctant to keep throwing away all of the knowledge and hard-won skills I've developed in favor of picking up new ones. It seems enormously, almost criminally wasteful. How many times should I throw away tens of thousands of lines of code in polished, battle-tested libraries, and knowledge of edge cases and gotchas and little efficiencies and everything else, so that I can start over again with a blank slate and a new language and a long road of new bugs and edge cases to learn? No other industry is as wasteful in terms of talent expended than ours is. Imagine if every single bridge ever built in this country was torn down and replaced every five years with a new bridge that featured new materials and new technology.

jburwell 11y ago

%s/MySQL/PostgreSQL/ and I violently agree with this article.

macavity23 11y ago

Oh my gods, I can't up vote this enough. This should be mandatory reading before one is allowed to use a text editor. Though PostgreSQL is as good a choice as MySQL. Technically better (AIUI) but with a less gigantic support base.