3 ms·
You're thinking way too small -- It's much more obvious if you'd use geological timescales to compare geological features.
by blasdel 17y ago
You're thinking way too small -- It's much more obvious if you'd use geological timescales to compare geological features.
- lispm 17y agoWhy should I do that? I'm a human. I find things I see awesome. I find all large 'falls' awesome. If the thing wasn't there a million years ago, who cares? I wasn't there also. But I'm here and some thing in the world can be observed by me as awesome. There are things that I might not find awesome after some years and there are other things that I find awesome for many years. Even if it is superseded by some newer stuff. The original iPod (I have one) is still awesome. It is a design classic. Timeless.