3 ms·
Part of it is, we can't even imagine a plausible way for all those worlds to be created. That they just pop into existence for every collapse of the wavefunctio
by xlm1717 11y ago
Part of it is, we can't even imagine a plausible way for all those worlds to be created. That they just pop into existence for every collapse of the wavefunction is an unsatisfactory explanation. The Copenhagen interpretation is more palatable because then we're dealing with just one Universe.
- RobertoG 11y agoAt least is a materialist theory. The other one is about the observer affecting the universe in an unknown way.
- trhway 11y ago>the observer affecting the universe in an unknown way. there is no pure "observation" in QM like the one we can imagine in classical case. Any observation in QM is actually an interaction. While i'm not a fan of Copenhagen, there is nothing un-materialistic that an interaction with the system affects its state, like a coin balancing on its edge finally would finally fall on one side upon you touching it.
- gizmo686 11y agoThere is no wavefunction collapse in many-worlds.