3 ms·
Yah, the author does a follow-up blogpost (albeit, only a few days later, and not years, hehe). http://yosefk.com/blog/high-level-cpu-follow-up.html http://yos
by _chris_ 11y ago
Yah, the author does a follow-up blogpost (albeit, only a few days later, and not years, hehe).
http://yosefk.com/blog/high-level-cpu-follow-up.html http://yosefk.com/blog/high-level-cpu-follow-up.html
- sourceless 11y agoI don't 100% agree with the author that the reduceron is a "Haskell Machine" - it seems very much to be the motivation for the project, but I think it's more of a 'strongly typed functional language machine'. I'd be inclined to think that the more general machine Yosef wishes for would come with time and more languages implemented. Heck, maybe restricting the kind of languages best supported is a necessary feature - you can't say that von Neumann doesn't best support imperative & procedural languages after all.