I like it, as well. It simplifies many things and no practical functionality is sacrificed. Most arguments against sysyemd appear to be appeals to tradition, n

I like it, as well. It simplifies many things and no practical functionality is sacrificed. Most arguments against sysyemd appear to be appeals to tradition, not based on any technical deficiency. In actual use I have found no fault with it and it does make some things easier. The only argument against sysyemd that I find somewhat sympathetic is the fact that there is always a cost to pay when migrating to and learning about something new. This is certainly true. However, I find the user experience of systemd to be superior, and this small upfront price seems worth paying.