4 ms·
> not in-line with the unix philosophy of 'do one thing and do it well' I'm not sure how you could, with a straight face, claim that sysvinit fits this descrip
by _delirium 11y ago
> not in-line with the unix philosophy of 'do one thing and do it well'
I'm not sure how you could, with a straight face, claim that sysvinit fits this description. It does many things, none of them particularly well.
- na85 11y agoReplacing a bad system (sysvinit) with another bad system (systemd) is just change for change's sake.
- throwaway2048 11y agoah yes, the old "everything must be perfect before we are allowed to change anything" scree. The only thing this accomplishes is ensuring no progress is made, ever.
- vezzy-fnord 11y agoWell, in fairness, systemd isn't really a matter of changing sysvinit. It's changing the entire low-level userspace, so there's a lot more one can object to, in principle.