4 ms·
I'd take it you've actually studied the Unit object, the internal graph engine, the transaction manager, the seven different job queuing modes, the contextual r
by vezzy-fnord 11y ago
I'd take it you've actually studied the Unit object, the internal graph engine, the transaction manager, the seven different job queuing modes, the contextual relationships between services, jobs and units, the semantics of the dependency and relationship model, how execution state is composed, etc.?
Those are seldom talked about, but are some of the primary reasons I object to systemd. Are you neutral on those aspects, or do you see them as definitively positive?
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- mercurial 11y agoNot having looked at the internals of systemd, I'll take your word for it. The question is, is it possible to offer a similar feature set with a simpler model?
- digi_owl 11y agoAt this point in time that is like asking of someone can support MS Office using simpler tools. That in turn invoke the old chestnut about how 99% of MS Office users use 1% of its features, but each use a different 1%.