4 ms·
What I'd really like is an all-in-one service that incorporated Docker Content Trust[0]. While I'd prefer that they'd used something a bit more mainstream (e.g
by jfindley 11y ago
What I'd really like is an all-in-one service that incorporated Docker Content Trust[0]. While I'd prefer that they'd used something a bit more mainstream (e.g. GPG), some image signing is better than none at all.
Doing this today requires a fair bit of extra infrastructure over a basic v2 registry, and really it'd be much nicer to have a single service that was able to manage this.
0: https://blog.docker.com/2015/08/content-trust-docker-1-8/ https://blog.docker.com/2015/08/content-trust-docker-1-8/
- tonyhb 11y agoGPG wasn't chosen because it's not as secure as content trust. Content trust provides all that GPG provides plus: - Replay attack prevention - Freshness guarantees (so you can't be given older, vulnerable images) - Trusted, delegated signing