4 ms·
This makes no difference at all in the deterrence scenario Yeah, right, we're going to trust these "phone home" devices that much? In fact, how do you know th
by hga 11y ago
This makes no difference at all in the deterrence scenario
Yeah, right, we're going to trust these "phone home" devices that much?
In fact, how do you know they're working, for police or civilians, unless they phone home every month or so, or at least when taken out of their metal safes.
In the current climate of bad faith, where our adversaries latest campaign for "gun safety" does nothing of the sort (and claims we don't care about it during a period where both the population and guns owned increased by roughly 50% and the absolute number of accidental gun deaths dropped by 25%; it is we gun owners who achieved that, not the gun grabbers)?
There's also the mass and volume problems. Not everyone can get away with carrying a near full sized M1911 like I can (originally a military service pistol, my carry model sacrifices some life with an alloy frame and some power with a 4 inch barrel). Require these and you will preclude a whole lot of concealed carry, and I for one would not like the extra mass, let alone having to replace some perfectly fine firearms.