3 ms·

In a (brief) defense of Docker Hub, it has gotten WAY better in just the last 6 months. UX is sufficient for the number of times you interact with the website,

In a (brief) defense of Docker Hub, it has gotten WAY better in just the last 6 months. UX is sufficient for the number of times you interact with the website, versus command line. Still it is very slow and this has an impact on my continuous deployment ambitions. In a world where we routinely ship 0.x tools to production, it may feel a bit peculiar to see 2.0 as being the first 'production ready' version for Docker's suite of tools, but that very well may be the reality.

csomar 11y ago
wow. I used it last month. Don't want to imagine how it was.
techdragon 11y ago
Docker files are still insufficient for building anything but trivial bloated stacks using any docker registry build service, forcing you to setup a CI pipeline to build and push your containers to your registry. They froze the syntax and this mountain of trouble is just getting worse. Then they modernised the UI and its just like ... Terrible. I have no more words for how much of a step backwards the latest UI is compared to the original one.
kordless 11y ago
Are you using it to build images? Anyone know of an image building service other than the current CI/CD suspects?
- joeyspn 11y ago
  Maybe something like https://www.tutum.co/ https://www.tutum.co/?
  - kordless 11y ago
    "coming soon" is listed on their build service, so no. I wonder if they do that in an unprivileged container?