3 ms·
The accounting fraud's[1] the best part of the AOL CD lore. For fiscal years 1995 and 1996, AOL capitalized most of the costs of acquiring new subscribers
by caminante 11y ago
The accounting fraud's[1] the best part of the AOL CD lore.
For fiscal years 1995 and 1996, AOL capitalized most of the costs
of acquiring new subscribers as "deferred membership acquisition
costs" ("DMAC") -- including the costs associated with sending disks
to potential customers and the fees paid to computer equipment
manufacturers who bundled AOL software onto their equipment -- and
reported those costs as an asset on its balance sheet, instead of
expensing those costs as incurred.
The financial impact?
Had these costs been properly expensed as incurred, AOL's 1995 reported
pretax loss would have been increased from $21 million to $98 million
(including the write-off of DMAC that existed as of the end of fiscal
year 1994), and AOL's 1996 reported pretax income of $62 million
would have been decreased to a pretax loss of $175 million.
[1]https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/34-42781.htm https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/34-42781.htm
- codewithcheese 11y agocool, interesting. can you comment on why they did that?
- tekromancr 11y agoNot the parent, but I think the reason is simply making your numbers look better. If you report the numbers this way, you look like you lost less money by writing off the disks as an asset instead of a marketing spend.