3 ms·
> the attackers used it to modify stories _A_ story. For 40 minutes. The prosecution couldn't even prove anyone saw the story in that time.
by bjacobel 11y ago
> the attackers used it to modify stories
_A_ story. For 40 minutes. The prosecution couldn't even prove anyone saw the story in that time.
- tptacek 11y agoThe damage figures the prosecution is using aren't based on the story itself. Tribune cites a $17,000 cleanup cost, which is, for a breach, cheap.
- bjacobel 11y ago"However, exhibits displayed during the defense’s opening arguments show supposed emails from Brandon Mercer, Keys’ ex-boss, saying, “If you bill a thousand dollars an hour, that will help us get it prosecuted,” suggested the government is misrepresenting the true cost. In another email from the exhibits, Mercer estimated the damage at around $3,800." http://motherboard.vice.com/read/low-level-vandalism-or-high-damage-hacking-day-two-of-the-matthew-keys-trial http://motherboard.vice.com/read/low-level-vandalism-or-high...
- gozo 11y agoSo? That should normally be covered by damages and not punishment. The reason the defense "fixates" on how long the story was up for is because that actually has to do with the severity of the crime.
- tptacek 11y agoI agree with that.