3 ms·
OK, I have no idea how the proof works, but I think I read the abstracts well enough to do something that might qualify as pretending to pretend to know how the
by powera 11y ago
OK, I have no idea how the proof works, but I think I read the abstracts well enough to do something that might qualify as pretending to pretend to know how the proof works: (please note: I'm not qualified to pretend to know how this works, I have to pretend twice to get anything that sounds like both math and English)
* Part 1: All chaotic systems are isomorphic to an elliptic curve [traditionally y2 = x3 + ax + b] for some extended definition of elliptic curves
* Part 2: A general method of constructing isomorphisms of chaotic systems to extended elliptic curves
* Part 3: Using the method from Part 2, construct a more understandable model of the chaotic structure of the natural numbers
* Part 4: Using the model constructed in part 3, construct a proof for abc
Hopefully if you understand any of this you can point out why I'm obviously wrong.
- unexistance 11y agoA for effort, since apparently mathematicians themselves are quite reluctant to do this...