>a state has the authority to compel someone into doing anything that has been sufficiently demonstrated to be a good decision These are dangerous words. "Suff

>a state has the authority to compel someone into doing anything that has been sufficiently demonstrated to be a good decision These are dangerous words. "Sufficiently demonstrated to be a good decision"? What does that even mean? My take on trying to derive the meaning of that sentence is that it doesn't actually mean anything. What is a "good decision" and what does it mean to be "sufficiently demonstrated"? I posit that no one could sufficiently define those words as to make an actionable decision criteria that satisfies those (highly abstract) requirements. Many states have felt that it was a good decision to force people into labor or death and the consequences have been severe. Are you really trying to reuse their (poor) reasoning?