3 ms·
why would they even risk it at all? So, you're saying terrorism works. It's ok to offend groups who don't resort to terrorism to destroy freedom of speech. T
by coolestuk 17y ago
why would they even risk it at all?
So, you're saying terrorism works. It's ok to offend groups who don't resort to terrorism to destroy freedom of speech.
That Google operates censorship in China and India is bad enough. Now you're saying the number 1 search engine in the west is right to censor.
- utku_karatas2 17y agoI'm not saying terrorism works. I'm just saying Google is not a non profit organisation promoting free speech.
- coolestuk 17y agoYou are saying terrorism works. You are saying that one of the most important companies in the world should discriminate in favour of one religion, because the adherents of that religion will use violence to get their way. Google has chosen to position itself as an ethical company. Google's motto is "do no evil". They want us to think they enshrine all that is good. Discriminating in favour of irrational and violent religious fundamentalists is evil.
- utku_karatas2 17y agoOh boy is this what's going on Abu Ghraib? How you got that meaning from my post I'll never know.