3 ms·
> That is where Aikido is being criticized. To get into a position for many of the takedowns is impractical. Sure, but didn't you just criticize wrestling alon
by itistoday2 11y ago
> That is where Aikido is being criticized. To get into a position for many of the takedowns is impractical.
Sure, but didn't you just criticize wrestling along the same lines?
I'm not claiming Aikido is "the best" martial art (I don't think that's a meaningful thing to say), I just said it was a favorite.
Many techniques are very practical and naturally flow in response to the actions of your opponent (like what to do if someone grabs or pushes you). Others could be less practical, I agree (at least less practical for someone like me).
- abritinthebay 11y ago> didn't you just criticize wrestling along the same lines? No-one is marketing wrestling as a practical fighting style (though it is of course useful to incorporate ideas from it). That's the difference. Aikido proponents act like it's actually useful in general fighting. It's not. It's useful when performing Aikido.