5 ms·
I agree. But "essential"? As in the innovation can't happen unless you use these essential services?
by talmand 11y ago
I agree. But "essential"? As in the innovation can't happen unless you use these essential services?
- c23gooey 11y agoI believe s73v3r is saying that using third party services allows you to dedicate more time to innovation, rather than spending your time coding services that already exist and are probably better than you can write yourself anyway.
- talmand 11y agoThat's what I agree to, but I still balk at the term essential in terms of innovation. It is not essential. Helpful, yes. Essential, no.
- s73v3r 11y agoIt absolutely can. But now you're dividing your time between what you're trying to innovate in, and doing boilerplate stuff that has already been solved and set up for you. There are only so many hours in the day.
- talmand 11y agoI have not disagreed with that. Is it wrong of me to think that the word "essential" is far too limiting for the context of the statement? You seem to agree with the point I'm trying to make here.