10 ms·
I have first hand experience of raising a child with Autism and with ABA therapy. The myth element dealing with ABA is a bit strange. The first statement seem
by hoopism 11y ago
I have first hand experience of raising a child with Autism and with ABA therapy.
The myth element dealing with ABA is a bit strange. The first statement seems focused on the prohibitive nature due to the commitment. Then it points out the implementation as being a form of abuse and lastly hints of discrediting the practice on the whole. Not sure what part is myth here...
I am not an expert but I know how it's worked for my kid and several other families. It's my understanding that Lovaas and early practitioners of ABA were much more strict in their approach. Children were made to sit for long periods through repetition and there was an element of "correcting" that could include a slap or stern language. From my understanding and experience this is just not the case anymore. ABA has adopted a lot of the methodology of other treatments such as floortime where the session is a play environment. There are discrete trials and it's still very data driven but it's structured into activities that the child (or adult) are motivated by. If ever my child was not enjoying their time or was being "abused" in any fashion we would be the first to stop the therapy.
We've encountered a number of older adults who work with children who are horrified that we chose to go with ABA as treatment. Their views are largely based on decades old information of the implementation. We've had those same people sit in on sessions and by the end they are taking notes and asking questions about ABA.
We do 20+ hours a week. It's intense but the intensity level is governed by my child's enthusiasm and willingness. If you have an ABA provider who is punishing, pushing or not creating a fun and loving atmosphere for your child then please speak with someone else (though I know this is not the case for vast majority of people).
- Amorymeltzer 11y agoThanks for sharing your experience! Genuinely curious (since I know a bit about them) why you went/stayed with ABA if the main positives and advances were adopted from DIR Floortime, etc. Why not go with Floortime?
- hoopism 11y agoWe actually did both. We felt that a lot of what floortime included were things we were doing (based on reading a number of books)... and I mean that as a positive. While I appreciate the child directed nature I felt like the structure and data driven model provided a better framework for our daughter. She's very young and a lot of what we work on are super fundamental skills. ABA (at least our provider) has been very thoughtful about creating a plan that identifies her struggles and implements strategies that are tailored to her to build skills. We tried a lot of things and could see positives in all of them... so we ultimately decided to cherry pick what we like and help structure her program. ABA provided us the framework to measure what works and what we need to change. I encourage parents to try a few things and see what works for them.