3 ms·
it's "basic human decency" if you're in favor and "political correctness" if you're not. Both refer to an external virtue/sin. This lkml conflict would be addr
by delish 11y ago
it's "basic human decency" if you're in favor and "political correctness" if you're not. Both refer to an external virtue/sin.
This lkml conflict would be addressed with statistics, that is: It would be so nice if we could give evidence that the culture improves the kernel's quality, or hurts it.
I have no opinion on whether it is or isn't "just basic human decency" or "the insidious threat of political correctness." I do think that if the kernel "succeeds" (for whatever definition of that) that we'll retroactively decide we defended against political correctness. And vice versa.
- dragonwriter 11y agoI think you have it backwards: people will believe that the Linux kernel is better than it would be without the cultural elements that are complained of if they believe the complaints are excessive political correctness, and believe that it is worse than it otherwise would be if they believe the complaints are about basic human decency.