6 ms·
That's somewhat disingenuous. Historically all software has been "monolith first" and has only adopted an SOA out of need. The microservice mindset is relativel
by debacle 11y ago
That's somewhat disingenuous. Historically all software has been "monolith first" and has only adopted an SOA out of need. The microservice mindset is relatively new, and we're not really going to see it mature for another year or few.
- nthj 11y agoIf the argument we're going with is “well, microservices-first is relatively new so we won't know for another year or 3 if this is a mature route to take, but everyone's trying it anyway so let's do that", there is NO WAY I can or want to sell microservices-first to stakeholders.
- debacle 11y agoThat's not really what I meant. There's a massive survivorship bias with monolithic architectures.
- mring33621 11y ago"relatively new"? I've seen lots of places use little http endpoints for discrete tasks. Whether the endpoint lives inside a shared container or has its own embedded server is an implementation detail.