2 ms·
No, but I would suggest that it's not a dealbreaker. Again, bandwidth pales in comparison to megabytes of Javascript and images getting pushed all over the pla
by jarek 11y ago
No, but I would suggest that it's not a dealbreaker.
Again, bandwidth pales in comparison to megabytes of Javascript and images getting pushed all over the place. On my nearly-blank test account loading Facebook.com fetches ~4 MB, including ~3 MB of Javascript with instructive names like https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v2/y0/r/64jGxSfxJ36.js https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v2/y0/r/64jGxSfxJ36.js and https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v2/yp/r/K6ojr4ngQRr.js https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v2/yp/r/K6ojr4ngQRr.js
In face of that, suggesting having to store some data 0.05 s away is problematic is a bit of a waffle