4 ms·
Working within the existing HTTP spec is an idea worth pursuing. Of course I'm biased because my startup is in the process of doing just this by implementing a
by mankins 11y ago
Working within the existing HTTP spec is an idea worth pursuing. Of course I'm biased because my startup is in the process of doing just this by implementing a 402 server. http://www.fairtread.com/ http://www.fairtread.com/
While the status code is a good place to start, you really need Accept-Monetization and the corresponding Content-Monetization headers to fill out the picture. We propose these to work the same way that Accept-Language and Content-Language headers work. Essentially the user passes along the monetization methods they allow, and when there's a mismatch on the server, a 402 error occurs...along with instructions on how to fix that.
The ideal system would allow multiple ways to pay for content, and would include advertising as a "free" option.
- throwaway4421 11y agoBuilding on HTTP 402 looks like a good path forward, but some tough love: the name fairtread.com looks like "fart read" or "fair read". The 't' gets lost in the middle because "read" makes more sense than "tread" in the context of paying to read web content.