Do I miss that in the article, or is it really not stated from where the information that the investigation is focusing on them is coming? People "familiar with

Do I miss that in the article, or is it really not stated from where the information that the investigation is focusing on them is coming? People "familiar with the matter" as only source? It would be a pretty bold (and irresponsible) move from a criminal investigation to leak suspects to the press that early, given that this will destroy their career. Stuff likes that needs prove or very very strong hints pointing at them, enough to start a trial, and there is no word about that. I understand everyone who thinks that this looks like presenting scapegoats. This stinks. The whole article shouldn't have been published like that, and we should not upvote it.